简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Qoin was developed as a non-cash payment facility. The company even falsely claimed regulatory authorization.
The Australian Securities and Exchange Commission (ASIC) has sued BPS Financial, seeking civil penalties for allegedly making false representations involving Qoin, a crypto asset token, when marketing.
Take Advantage of the Biggest Financial Event in London. This year we have expanded to new verticals in Online Trading, Fintech, Digital Assets, Blockchain, and Payments.
The company is alleged to have engaged in unlicensed conduct to a non-cash payment facility for the cryptocurrency.
BPS established the Qoin Facility in January 2020 as a non-cash payment facility. It included Qoin tokens, a Qoin wallet, and a blockchain-based distributed digital ledger. The tokens were promoted to retail consumers and business owners.
According to ASIC, the misrepresentations include the assurance of exchanging Qoin for other cryptocurrencies or fiat. Additionally, BPS claimed that Qoin tokens could be used for purchasing goods and services from registered merchants.
A sister entity of BPS enabled the exchange of Qoin tokens for the Australian dollar, but it has imposed increasingly restrictive limits over time.
Moreover, BPS claimed that both the token and the associated wallet are regulated in Australia, which ASIC highlighted to be false. In addition, the misrepresentations include claims of Qoin and BPS to be compliant with financial services laws.
“We allege that, despite what BPS represented in its marketing, Qoin merchant numbers have been declining and that there have been periods of time where it was not possible to exchange Qoin tokens through independent exchanges,” said the Deputy Chair of ASIC, Sarah Court.
“ASIC is particularly concerned about the alleged misrepresentation that the Qoin Facility is regulated in Australia, as we believe more than 79,000 individuals and entities who have been issued with the Qoin Facility may have believed that it was compliant with financial services laws, when ASIC considers it was not.”
ASIC has been very vigilant against misleading crypto projects lately. It temporarily halted Holon's three cryptocurrency funds for not being suitable for retail investors. The regulatory is also earning against potential scams.
“Where it falls within our remit, ASIC will take targeted action against unlicensed conduct and misleading promotion of crypto-asset financial products that could harm consumers – this is a key priority for ASIC. Crypto-assets are highly volatile, inherently risky, and complex,” Court added.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Explore this guide we have exposed Investing Capital, which has mounted concerns for traders by disallowing withdrawals and making them lose their hard-earned money.
In this blog, we will share with you a guide telling you about the tactics fraudsters employ to dupe investors.
RBI issued a warning last year against 75 forex brokers. Those brokers are globally popular and regulated in other countries, but they are banned in India. Only few brokers even have physical offices located in India. So, why do global brokers face so many challenges in entering the Indian market?
With multiple regulatory entries and one license now revoked, Aetos stands as a broker requiring closer scrutiny from investors, particularly those prioritizing license scope and jurisdictional compliance.