简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has taken action against Shartru Wealth Management Pty Ltd (Shartru) by imposing additional conditions on its Australian financial services (AFS) license.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has taken action against Shartru Wealth Management Pty Ltd (Shartru) by imposing additional conditions on its Australian financial services (AFS) license. The move comes in the wake of a targeted surveillance conducted by ASIC, which uncovered significant issues with Shartru's monitoring and supervision of its representatives. Moreover, some of Shartru's financial advice was found to be non-compliant with the best interests duty and related obligations.
To address these concerns and ensure better compliance, ASIC has mandated specific requirements that Shartru must meet. The most crucial among these is engaging an independent consultant to thoroughly review and offer recommendations on its audit processes. This independent expert will also assess a sample of advice, audits, and pre-vets, reporting back on the effectiveness of the improvements implemented by Shartru.
As responsible AFS licensees, companies like Shartru bear the responsibility of ensuring that their representatives strictly adhere to financial services laws. Part of this obligation involves establishing adequate audit processes to effectively monitor and supervise their representatives. Regular and comprehensive audits of advisers should be conducted, with appropriately qualified staff assigned to perform these audits.
Shartru has been the holder of AFS license no. 422409 since 30 July 2012. The imposition of these license conditions was carried out by mutual consent, indicating Shartru's cooperation in addressing the issues raised by ASIC.
Conclusion
This regulatory action by ASIC emphasizes the critical role played by financial services providers in maintaining compliance and upholding the best interests of their clients. By imposing these additional conditions, ASIC aims to foster a culture of accountability and ensure that financial advice provided to consumers aligns with the highest standards of professionalism and integrity. The effectiveness of the measures taken by Shartru in response to ASIC's concerns will be closely monitored, with a focus on safeguarding the interests of investors and maintaining the overall integrity of the financial services industry.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Gold prices have surged to unprecedented levels in early 2025, reflecting heightened investor demand for safe-haven assets.
Yen pressured by weak Japanese data and improved risk sentiment; BoJ expected to hold rates steady.
FXTM and AvaTrade are two well-established online brokers offering forex and CFD trading across global markets. Both enjoy strong reputations and high ratings on WikiFX—FXTM holds an AAA overall rating, while AvaTrade scores 9.49/10, indicating they’re regarded as reliable choices by the community. However, since brokers have great reputation in the industry, how do we know which one is more suitable for individuals to invest in? Today's article is about the comparison between FXTM and AvaTrade.
The yen's breakout above the 140 mark has caught global attention, and the reasons behind it are more than technical.