简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has initiated criminal proceedings against Guy Flintham, accusing him of engaging in fraudulent activities by false representation and conducting a regulated activity without proper authorization.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has initiated criminal proceedings against Guy Flintham, accusing him of engaging in fraudulent activities by false representation and conducting a regulated activity without proper authorization.
According to the FCA, spanning from January 2016 to November 2021, Mr. Flintham, residing in Blackburn, Lancashire, allegedly defrauded approximately 240 investors, enticing them to invest around £19 million in an investment scheme under his operation.
Flintham is alleged to have made misleading claims to investors regarding the operation of the scheme and the profits they could anticipate. He went as far as falsifying documents to substantiate some of these claims.
In the course of accepting funds from investors, Flintham undertook the regulated activity of accepting deposits, a function for which he lacked the necessary authorization. Consequently, the FCA asserts that, as an unauthorized individual, Flintham committed the offense of engaging in regulated activity without proper authorization or exemption.
Appearing at Westminster Magistrates Court on January 22, 2024, Mr. Flintham entered a plea of Not Guilty regarding the charge of carrying on regulated activity without proper authorization or exemption. However, he did not provide a plea in connection with the fraud offense. The case has been forwarded to Southwark Crown Court for a Plea and Trial Preparation Hearing scheduled for February 19, 2024.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
In recent years, a new breed of retailer-focused trading firms has emerged: proprietary (prop) trading outfits that recruit individual traders to trade the firm’s capital under structured rules. Boasting low entry costs, clear risk parameters, and profit-sharing incentives, these prop firms are rapidly winning over retail traders, many of whom previously traded Contracts for Difference (CFDs) with established online brokers. As prop trading revenues accelerate, a key question arises: Are CFD brokers losing business to prop firms?
Malaysia’s police are stepping up their investigation into the MBI investment scam, a multi-billion ringgit fraud that has dragged on for nearly a decade. The Royal Malaysian Police (PDRM) is now planning to arrest another prominent figure with the title ‘Tan Sri’, following recent arrests and major asset seizures.
Tradu, a global trading platform, integrates with TradingView for seamless CFD and forex trading, offering transparency, tight spreads, and fast execution.
Gold surged to an all-time high on Tuesday, driven by renewed weakness in the US dollar, ongoing trade war tensions, and critical remarks from President Donald Trump aimed at the Federal Reserve. These factors fuelled strong demand for safe-haven assets, pushing bullion above US$3,485 an ounce for the first time. But what exactly are safe haven assets? Why is everyone raving about them?