简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:The 2025 iteration of the U.S.-China trade conflict has taken on a scale and complexity far surpassing previous episodes, marking a significant escalation under former President Donald Trump’s return to the White House.
The 2025 U.S.-China trade war is much bigger and more complex than any previous round. It began after Donald Trump returned to the White House and launched a wide-reaching tariff plan, not just against China, but against more than 100 countries. China, however, remains the main target.
In 2024, the U.S. saw a sharp rise in its trade deficit, which is the gap between what it imports and exports, with China as its biggest contributor. As a result, the U.S. added a new 34% tariff on Chinese imports. With earlier tariffs included, the total average tariff on Chinese goods has now reached a record high of 65%. This is a major change from earlier trade disputes, where tariff increases were more limited. Now, Chinese exports face much tougher restrictions.
In the past, trade tensions mainly focused on traditional industries like steel and cars. But the 2025 dispute is different. It‘s heavily focused on advanced technologies. China’s progress in areas like artificial intelligence, especially with its breakthrough large model, DeepSeek, has caused serious concern in the U.S. In response, the U.S. has placed strong limits on tech exports to China, aiming to slow its development in key areas.
This new round of tariffs is also causing major problems for global supply chains. In the past, businesses could avoid some tariffs by shipping goods through third countries. But now, the U.S. is pressuring countries like Mexico and Canada to match its high tariffs on Chinese products. If they agree, they can avoid the new 25% tariff from the U.S. This strategy makes it harder for companies to use transhipment as a workaround and raises the cost of doing international business.
Unlike earlier trade wars, where most countries stayed out of the conflict, this time, many nations are affected and frustrated. With over 100 countries hit by tariffs, China now has a chance to build global partnerships. Instead of dealing with the U.S. alone, China is trying to work with other affected countries and even gain support from within the U.S. to push back against the tariff campaign.
Chinas response has also become more advanced. Instead of just raising tariffs in return, it has taken several steps. These include blacklisting U.S. companies, stopping some U.S. products from entering China, restricting exports of key rare earth materials, and taking legal action through the World Trade Organization. This shows a move from simple retaliation to a broader and more strategic approach.
In short, the 2025 U.S.-China trade war is very different from the past. It involves more countries, deeper technology disputes, and stronger impacts on global supply chains. It may reshape how global trade works for years to come.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has imposed a $300,000 fine on SpeedRoute LLC for a series of supervisory, risk management, and anti-money laundering (AML) program deficiencies spanning from 2017 to the present. Of this amount, $75,000 is payable to FINRA, with the remainder offset by SpeedRoute’s limited ability to pay. In addition to the monetary penalty, SpeedRoute has been censured and ordered to overhaul its compliance framework, including enhancing its written supervisory procedures (WSPs) for market access controls and strengthening its AML program.
Despite being rich in oil, Nigeria struggles with refining shortages. What’s behind this paradox, and how are different actors reacting?
Far from being mere policy tools, tariffs and trade restrictions have repeatedly served as catalysts for economic upheaval, diplomatic rifts, and even armed conflict. Here are ten historically significant trade wars that altered the course of nations and the global economy.
The SEC and DOJ charge Ramil Palafox in a $200 million crypto fraud, alleging Ponzi-like scam and misused investor funds for luxury goods and lavish events.